Paper 1: C
+ good organization
- bad grammar, not enough sources used in intro, tables were under the methods section rather than the results section
Paper 2: F
+had each required section (intro, methods, etc)
-bad grammar/sentences don't flow well, intro way too short, methods section was too short, too short in general, only 1 table
Paper 3: B
+good organization, intro had required amount of sources
-didn't cite sources in the intro
Paper 4: A
+intro had required amount of sources, good organization (lots of subheadings)
-none
Paper 5: A-
+had the required amount of sources in intro,
-long methods section
Paper 6: A-
+good intro
-in-text citations
No comments:
Post a Comment